USPTO serial 76193587
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kitchener, Ontario N2N 3H6, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B Eisen
MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO20 QUEEN ST WSTE 3202 BOX 102TORONTO, ON M5H 3R3| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Folding metal bins, metal freestanding tool racks, metal wall-mounted tool racks, folding benches, workbenches, storage racks, and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Folding non-metal bins, non-metal freestanding tool racks, non-metal wall-mounted tool racks, folding benches, workbenches, storage racks, and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |