Drawing for TORII

USPTO serial 76194302

TORII

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORII?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in producing reports, collecting and presenting data, managing data, analyzing data, sending and receiving data and information relating to the analysis of data in electronic form; CD-ROMs featuring informational video and audio recordings relating to the use of the aforementioned softwareACTIVE—
035Business information services featuring data on customer satisfaction, branding research, advertising research, sales, information on the production, management and analysis of reports, information on the collecting and presenting of data, information on managing data, information relating to specific research criteria; providing an on-line computer database in the field of business, products and marketing research for use in research, tracking, producing reports, collecting and presenting data, managing data, analyzing data, sending and receiving data and information relating to the analysis of data in electronic formACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance