USPTO serial 76197270
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS S. KEATY
THOMAS S. KEATY KEATY PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION2140 WORLD TRADE CENTER2 CANAL STREETNEW ORLEANS, LA 70130| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers, porter, table drinking water, mineral water, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic fruit drinks, soft drinks and syrups for making fruit drinks and soft drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |