USPTO serial 76200817
TECHNISHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2971068Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHNISHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald R. Santucci, Esq.; Marilyn Matthes Brogan, Esq.
RONALD R SANTUCCI ESQ MARILYN MATTHE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Carbon-based structural composite part-forming materials containing silicon for enhanced recession performance in high temperature applications used for insulation and soundproofing in atmospheric re-entry of space vehicles and in the manufacture of land vehicles, yachts, ships, aircraft and space vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 16, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Albany International Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Albany International Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Albany International Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named TECHNISHIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |