USPTO serial 76200824
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Calgary, Aberta T2T 3M8, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRA S. DORMAN
IRA S DORMAN330 ROBERTS ST STE 200EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, skin creams, face creams, skin cleaning creams and washes, body soap and shampoo | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer software for use in the areas of personal wellness, diagnosis of illnesses and treatment of illnesses including traditional and alternative treatments | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing information relating to recreational activities via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information relating to personal wellness, medicine, alternative medicine, exercise, nutrition, food supplements, and personal health via a global computer network; operation of a health spa; operation of a medical clinic providing surgery, post operative care, diagnosis and treatment of illness and counseling | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |