USPTO serial 76201359
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary R. Duvall
Sandra Edelman, Esq. Dorsey & Whitney LLP250 Park Avenue, 15th FloorNew York, NY 10177UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic ingredient used as a component in the manufacture of eye mask, facial mask, body lotions, hand lotions, bath gels, shower gels, non-medicated bath additives, namely, bath salts and gels, bath and shower foams; non-medicated bath treatments, namely, bath oils, bubble bath, non-medicated shower and bath gel; facial cleansers, body cleansers, facial toner, astringent, eye makeup removers, intensive body care preparations, namely, body lotions, creams, body wash, hand cream and lotion; intensive skin care preparations, namely, face and body moisturizers, skin creams, moisturizers, gels and lotions, face soaps, skin cleansers and skin protectants; foundation, mascara, eyeshadows, liquid eyeliner, eyebrow pencils, blushes, bronzers, lip pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, non-medicated blemish concealers in stick form, non-medicated blemish concealers in cream form, fragrances, scented body lotions, scented body powders; skin protectants, namely, body lotions, gels, creams and conditioners; and skin bleaching creams | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2002 |
| 005 | Medicated cosmetic skin ingredient used in the manufacture of body lotions, gels, creams and conditioners, acne creams, acne gels, acne astringents and acne lotions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |