USPTO serial 76205599
PURI PHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURI PHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC D PAULSRUD
MICHAEL A BONDI PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN4800 IDS CTR 80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Pre-moistened non-medicated personal hygiene wipes, namely, baby wipes, diaper rash wipes, hand wipes, body wipes, deodorant wipes, freshen up face wipes, feminine hygiene wipes, stress relief wipes, acne wipes, hemorrhoid relief wipes, herpes relief wipes, itch soother wipes, bug repellant wipes, sports injury wipes, wound injury wipes, anti-aging face and neck wipes, eye pad wipes for reducing puffiness, and mascara and eye makeup remover wipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |