Drawing for PREVIEW

USPTO serial 76206873

PREVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott M. Oldham

SCOTT M OLDHAM TWIN OAKS ESTATEHAHN, LOESER & PARK1225 W MARKET STAKRON, OH 44313-7188

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic transmission of data and message via the InternetACTIVE—
039Electronic storage of data and messagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jan 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 5, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 4, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 13, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance