Drawing for EZ CLEAN

USPTO serial 76208433

EZ CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZ CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ezra Sutton

PLZ 9900 RTE 9 NWOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095-1003

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003ALL PURPOSE HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS AND DISH DETERGENTSACTIVESep 30, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 18, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 18, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 7, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 4, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance