USPTO serial 76209645
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Engelmann
ALEXANDRA NICHOLSON ESQ DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | musical sound recordings, musical video recordings; audio recordings, audio cassettes, video recordings, video discs CDs and DVDs, all featuring information and entertainment of general interest to children, parents and families | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |