USPTO serial 76209759
PERMA-CLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERMA-CLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold B. Dompieri
ARNOLD B DOMPIERI LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | ELASTOMERIC MOLDING COMPOUND FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF MOLDED ELASTOMERIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, OUTDOOR CONTAINERS AND BOTTLE HOLDERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |