Drawing for GREN

USPTO serial 76210645

GREN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2968821Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 12, 2005
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GREN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ZHIYU HU

ZHIYU HU ZHIYU HU PC100 PLAINFIELD AVE STE 2EDISON, NJ 08817UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobile parts, namely, brake and parts therefore, namely rotors, drums, pads, shoes, hoses, cables master cylinders, and wheel cylinders; Automobile parts, namely, wipe blades, ball joints and CV jointsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 31, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 12, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2004CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance