USPTO serial 76210645
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZHIYU HU
ZHIYU HU ZHIYU HU PC100 PLAINFIELD AVE STE 2EDISON, NJ 08817UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobile parts, namely, brake and parts therefore, namely rotors, drums, pads, shoes, hoses, cables master cylinders, and wheel cylinders; Automobile parts, namely, wipe blades, ball joints and CV joints | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |