Drawing for VIRTUAL CONCIERGE

USPTO serial 76222140

VIRTUAL CONCIERGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL CONCIERGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig N. Killen

CRAIG N KILLEN NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGHP O BOX 11070COLUMBIA, SC 29211-1070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Developing databases for others, namely providing to corporate clients such as telecommunications and travel-related companies databases featuring information regarding specific geographic areas that can be accessed by end usersACTIVEDec 31, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 30, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance