USPTO serial 76226092
SERVICEPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERVICEPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER, NAMELY, HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING WEB SERVICES, NAMELY, HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS; DESIGNING, CREATING, AND CUSTOMIZING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; INTEGRATING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER CONSULTING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING AND CONFIGURATION FOR OTHERS; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; UP-DATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS, TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON; COMPUTER SOFTWARE INTEGRATION CONSULTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |