Drawing for GETTY EXPRESS CHARGE

USPTO serial 76229789

GETTY EXPRESS CHARGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GETTY EXPRESS CHARGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARRIET E PERKINS

HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP18TH & CHERRY STSONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Unattended automated credit card processors for charging of fuel at filling stationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 3, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 4, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 4, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 2, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 20011.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 3, 20011.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Dec 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance