USPTO serial 76231845
HITECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HITECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACK E DOMINIK
JACK E DOMINIK DOMINIK, KNECHTEL, DEMEUR & SAMLANMIAMI LAKES CORPORATE PLZ6175 NW 153RD ST STE 225MIAMI LAKES, FL 33014Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PORTABLE RADIO WITH AUDIO CASSETTE PLAYER, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, MUSIC SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPACT DISC PLAYER AND AUDIO SPEAKERS, PERSONAL STEREO SYSTEM COMPRISED OF AUDIO CASSETTE PLAYERS, STEREO TUNERS, PERSONAL COMPACT DISC PLAYER, TELEVISION, VIDEO CASSETTE PLAYER, TELEPHONES, CAR STEREO SYSTEM COMPRISED OF AUDIO SPEAKERS, AUDIO CASSETTE DECKS, TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINE, DVD UNITS, AND HEADPHONES | ACTIVE | May 19, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |