USPTO serial 76235429
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Manotick, Ontario K4M 1B8, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY M. KADEN
JEFFREY M KADEN GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Database management software for use in the field of financial services; graphical user interface software for use with encryption software; virus protection software; data processors; computers and their components, namely, interfaces and modems; blank data, electronic, magnetic and optical storage and recording media, namely, blank CD-ROMs, floppy disks, and smartcards; network components, namely routers, cables, servers, printers, modems; computer hardware, namely work stations and personal computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computerized on-line retail services in the field of financial services; promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed through a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | maintenance and repair of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |