USPTO serial 76238114
SMART PEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART PEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ballpoint pens, pens that have a three in one feature that includes three different colored inks, and one lead mechanical pencil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |