USPTO serial 76243327
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Breda, NL
Breda, NL
PERFETTI VAN MELLE BENELUX B.V.
BREDA 4815 HK, NL
PERFETTI VAN MELLE BENELUX B.V.
BREDA 4815 HK, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicolette R. Hudson
NICOLETTE R HUDSON FROST BROWN TODD LLC2200 PNC CTR 201 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cocoa, cocoa mixes; chocolate, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chocolate chips, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies, chocolate topping; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; pastries; frozen confections; confectionery chips for baking; caramel and caramel popcorn; peppermint candy chips for baking; peppermint candy, candy, liquorice; ice; cereal-based snack food, rice-based snack food, granola-based snack bars, and wheat- based snack foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |