USPTO serial 76253098
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce J. Goldner
BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP4 TIMES SQ FL 24NEW YORK, NY 10036-6522UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF WIRELESS TEXT COMMUNICATIONS, USED TO ACCESS WIRELESS TEXT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, WHETHER THROUGH A MOBILE TELEPHONE, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT (PDA), OTHER WIRELESS DEVICE, DESKTOP, LAPTOP, OR OTHER PORTABLE COMPUTER, OR THROUGH INTERNET WEB SITES; VOICE DETECTION SOFTWARE USED TO CONVERT SPOKEN WORDS INTO WRITTEN TEXT USED IN CONNECTION WITH WIRELESS TEXT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH BANNER ADVERTISEMENTS OR OTHER ELECTRONIC TEXT, SUCH ADVERTISEMENTS BEING SENT VIA A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE TO SUBSCRIBERS OF SUCH SERVICE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | WIRELESS DATA COMMUNICATION SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH A TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLATFORM, THROUGH WHICH TEXT MESSAGES CAN BE SENT OR RECEIVED FROM ONE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE TO ANOTHER, FEATURING SUCH SERVICES AS VOICE DETECTION AND VOICE-TO-TEXT PROCESSING, A SINGLE PERMANENT ADDRESS FOR ALL WIRELESS AND WIRELINE DEVICES OF A SUBSCRIBER OF APPLICANT'S SERVICES, A CUSTOMIZED DISPLAY ALIAS FOR SELECTED SUBSCRIBERS OF APPLICANT'S SERVICE, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF DELIVERY OR RECEIPT OF A MESSAGE, CRITERIA TO CONTROL WHEN, WHERE, AND FROM AND TO WHOM TO DELIVER MESSAGES, AN ADDRESS LIST, A LIST OF RECENT, FAVORITE, OR SELECTED CONTACTS, A GROUP ADDRESS USED TO DESIGNATE A PARTICULAR GROUP OF SUBSCRIBERS, GROUP MESSAGING, ELECTRONIC TEXT MESSAGING, NAMELY, THE RECORDING, STORAGE AND WIRELESS TRANSMISSION OF TEXT MESSAGES, SYNCHRONIZATION WITH PERSONAL CALENDAR APPLICATIONS, E-MAIL SERVICES AND NOTIFICATION, VIRTUAL FAX SERVICE AND NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, ROUTING, AND CLEARING MESSAGES THROUGH APPLICANT'S TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLATFORM | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |