USPTO serial 76253791
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY P GOONAN
GREGORY P GOONAN MUSICK PEELER GARRETT LLP225 BROADWAY STE 1900SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-5047UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements accessed by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless, handheld devices and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely local, long distance and international transmission of voice, data, text, facsimile, video, and graphics, by means of, telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld devices and the Internet; providing access to directory services by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless, handheld devices and the Internet; electronic mail and voice messaging services, namely, electronic store and forwarding of messages by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless handheld devices and the Internet; computer aided transmission of messages and images; transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; paging services; communications exchange services by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless, handheld devices and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Online services, namely providing customized web pages and email notifications featuring user-oriented information and links | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |