USPTO serial 76258805
BRAINFRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAINFRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Lee Taylor
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer peripherals; racks for housing computer hardware and servers; computer software for operating, monitoring, controlling and managing servers, computer hardware, computer networks and power supplies; computer software for tracking and controlling inventory; computer software for controlling racks for housing computer hardware and servers; computer software for billing; computer software for monitoring power use and billing therefor; uninterruptible electrical power supplies; power monitoring equipment, namely, power distribution strips and computer software for use with uninterruptible power supplies for monitoring environmental control, network protection systems, temperature and humidity control; power control systems, namely power distribution strips controlled by computer software and computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business services, namely, managing use of servers, computer hardware, computer networks and power supplies by others; managing a business for others, namely, data centers; providing accounts receivable and billing services to others | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installing hardware for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing computer data centers for others, and installing software and data in computer data centers for others; business services, namely, monitoring use of servers, computer hardware, computer networks and power supplies by others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Future Structures LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Future Structures LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRAINFRAME
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |