USPTO serial 76260586
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dicran Halajian
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORPPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and computer devices enabled for wireless communication, namely-- computers; computer mice; video conference equipment, namely, video monitors, microphones, audio speakers, and cameras; remote controls for radios, televisions, stereos, lights, video cassette recorders, DVD machines, and electronic door openers; consumer electronic products, namely, televisions, radios, stereos, personal digital assistants, video cassette recorders, and DVD machines; video gaming equipment, namely, joysticks, interactive remote control units, video game machines for use with televisions and computers, and monitors; security systems comprised of security alarms, anti-intrusion alarms, intrusion detectors, personal security alarms, and electronic motion sensitive switches; electrical and heating systems comprised of controllers, thermostats, and electrical resistance heating wires; glass breakage monitoring sensors; wireless keypads; child monitoring systems comprised of video cameras, and audio speakers; smoke and fire detectors; fire alarms; alarm stations; personal transponders; garage door openers; voice control systems comprised of voice sensors and voice recognition software therefor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |