USPTO serial 76260762
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
91300, Massy, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2809UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetic and optical recording media, namely blank compact discs, blank diskettes, blank CD-ROMs, blank cartridges; software packages featuring software for recording computer, audio or video data; equipment for information processing, namely computers, computer peripherals, multimedia products, namely magnetic, optical,image and sound media, namely blank computer discs, blank diskettes, blank CD-ROMs, blank cartridges; computer hardware namely communications servers; electronic database in the field of computer science recorded on computer media; units for recording, reproducing and transmitting data, sound and images, namely computers, hard drives, audiocassette recorders, scanners, CD-RW, and DVD-RAM | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Audio broadcasting, broadcasting programs via a global computer network, radio broadcasting, television broadcasting, telephone services; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; electronic mail services; electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, information, images, signals and messages via a global computer network; electronic transmission of messages, data, and images; providing online chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning computer science; databases in the field of telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for others; computer services, namely upgrading computer software; computer programming services for others; design of computer software for others; computer hardware and software consulting services; providing data automation and collection services using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze, and collect service data; providing an online computer database in the field of computer science | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |