Drawing for EYEBLASTER

USPTO serial 76265370

EYEBLASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYEBLASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harris A. Wolin

Harris A. Wolin Myers Wolin, LLC100 Headquarters PlazaNorth Tower, 6th FloorMorristown, NJ 07960

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable Internet platform for use in creating and/or creating an/or transmitting via the Internet massages and/or advertisements which are user interactive and may be animated and/or may contain video and/or audioACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 27, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 26, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 19, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance