USPTO serial 76268916
VEING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin H. Kaminash
BENJAMIN H KAMINASH KAMINASH & ASSOCIATES, LLCPO BOX 3317PORTLAND, OR 97208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL CAMERAS; MICROPHONES; PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAYS; LIGHT LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS; PLASMA DISPLAYS; VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS; BLANK HARD DISCS, BLANK OPTICAL DISCS, BLANK MAGNETIC DISCS, AND BUBBLE MEMORY FOR DATA STORAGE IN THE FIELDS OF VIRTUAL REALITY, TELEPRESENCE, AND IMMERSIVE IMAGERY; HIGH SPEED DATA TRANSMISSION MODEMS; HIGH SPEED DATA TRANSMISSION RECEIVERS; HIGH SPEED DATA TRANSMISSION TRANSMITTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR IMAGERY CREATION, CONTENT STORAGE, HIGH SPEED DATA TRANSMISSION, AND IMMERSIVE IMAGERY; VIRTUAL REALITY DEVICES, NAMELY, HEADSETS FOR USE AS IMMERSIVE IMAGERY AND AUDIO RECEIVERS AND CONTROLLERS, HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS AND BODY-OPERATED ACTUATORS TO CONTROL DISTANT MACHINERY, TO CREATE AND ACT IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, TO CONTROL AND OPERATE MACHINERY, MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND OTHERWISE ACT REMOTELY IN HOSTILE AND NONHOSTILE REAL ENVIRONMENTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGERY DEVICES, NAMELY, HEADSETS FOR USE AS IMMERSIVE IMAGERY AND AUDIO RECEIVERS AND CONTROLLERS, HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS AND BODY-OPERATED ACTUATORS TO CONTROL DISTANT MACHINERY, TO CREATE AND ACT IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, TO CONTROL AND OPERATE MACHINERY, MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND OTHERWISE ACT REMOTELY IN HOSTILE AND NONHOSTILE REAL ENVIRONMENTS; TELEPRESENCE DEVICES, NAMELY, HEADSETS FOR USE AS IMMERSIVE IMAGERY AND AUDIO RECEIVERS AND CONTROLLERS, HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS AND BODY-OPERATED ACTUATORS TO CONTROL DISTANT MACHINERY, TO CREATE AND ACT IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, TO CONTROL AND OPERATE MACHINERY, MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND OTHERWISE ACT REMOTELY IN HOSTILE AND NONHOSTILE REAL ENVIRONMENTS; IMMERSIVE IMAGERY DEVICES, NAMELY, HEADSETS FOR USE AS IMMERSIVE IMAGERY AND AUDIO RECEIVERS AND CONTROLLERS, HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS AND BODY-OPERATED ACTUATORS TO CONTROL DISTANT MACHINERY, TO CREATE AND ACT IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, TO CONTROL AND OPERATE MACHINERY, MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND OTHERWISE ACT REMOTELY IN HOSTILE AND NONHOSTILE REAL ENVIRONMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |