Drawing for KAYMED IMPRESSION

USPTO serial 76268932

KAYMED IMPRESSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAYMED IMPRESSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Atkins

ELIZABETH ATKINS DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, PRESSURE-RELIEF PADS, CUSHIONS, MATTRESSES, OVERLAY PADS, COVERS FOR CUSHIONS, COVERS FOR MATTRESSES, PADS FOR MEDICAL USE, SUPPORT PADS, CUSHIONS AND MATTRESSES FOR MEDICAL USE, FOAM PILLOWS FOR MEDICAL USE, ANTI-BACTERIAL PADS, PADS AND CUSHIONS FOR MEDICAL USE, FOAM CUSHIONS FOR MEDICAL USE, FOAM MATTRESSES FOR MEDICAL USEACTIVE—
020SEAT CUSHIONS; PILLOWS; MATTRESSES; BEDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 31, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 23, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance