Drawing for DOLPHINGIRL

USPTO serial 76268974

DOLPHINGIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOLPHINGIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheila M. Riley

SHEILA M RILEY REYNOLDS CASAS & RILEY LLPONE FIRST ST STE 2LOS ALTOS, CA 94022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer products, namely, computer game software, computer game disks, computer game programs, computer game cassettes and tapes, computer game cartridges, multimedia software recorded on a CD-ROM featuring computer games, computer game software that is downloadable from a global computer network; Computers; Computer hardware; Computer firmware that is computer game software; Computer firmware applications for gaming; Video game cartridges and video game tape cassettes; Pre-recorded video tapes featuring computer games and animated computer game characters; Cinematographic films featuring the action and adventure genre and animated characters; Computer game programs and video game machines for use with televisions sets; Motion picture films featuring the action and adventure genre and animated charactersACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, action figures, fantasy character toys, mechanical toys, soft sculpture plush toys, stuffed and wind-up toys, board games, action skill games, and arcade games; playthings, namely, play and action figuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 2, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 22, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance