USPTO serial 76269152
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FACTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FACTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pharma Cosmetix Research, L.L.C.
Richmond, VA
Pharma Cosmetix Research, L.L.C.
Colonial Heights, VA
Pharma Cosmetix Research, L.L.C.
Colonial Heights, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Henley, III
Robert P. Henley, III Hirschler FleischerPost Office Box 500Richmond, VA 23218-0500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Health products, medicinal products, non-medicinal products, drugs, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and beauty products | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pharma Cosmetix Research, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Pharma Cosmetix Research, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Pharma Cosmetix Research, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class A
- Similar marks named ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FACTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |