USPTO serial 76269168
AEROCRINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEROCRINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-171 41 Solna, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VANESSA C HEW
VANESSA C HEW DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |