Drawing for PINER CREEK RANCH

USPTO serial 76269255

PINER CREEK RANCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PINER CREEK RANCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Toni L. Griffin

TONI L GRIFFIN O'BRIEN WATTERS & DAVIS LLPP O BOX 3759SANTA ROSA, CA 95402-3759UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WINEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 24, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance