Drawing for Y-?

USPTO serial 76269506

Y-?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Y-??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph D. Lewis

JOSEPH D LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, a newspaper column consisting of articles of general interest by children, teenagers and young adultsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 10, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance