Drawing for VIA CURE

USPTO serial 76270163

VIA CURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIA CURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kaushal R. Odedra

KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001ultraviolet light drying resins and electron-beam drying resins for use in the manufacture of paints, inks, varnishes, lacquers, coatings, automobiles, plasticsACTIVE—
002ultraviolet light drying applications, namely, varnishes, lacquers in the nature of coatings, inks for engraving, inks for use in the manufacture of printed circuit boards, inks for ink jet printers, and paints for use in the manufacture of automobiles, paints for use on ceramics, and paints for interior and exterior use; and electron-beam drying applications, namely, varnishes, lacquers in the nature of coatings, inks for engraving, inks for use in the manufacture of printed circuit boards, inks for ink jet printers, and paints for use in the manufacture of automobiles, paints for use on ceramics, and paints for interior and exterior useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance