USPTO serial 76270401
PANSEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008125Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PANSEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pan Security International Ltd.
Solihull, GB
Pan Security International Ltd.
Solihull, GB
Pan Security International Ltd.
Solihull, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shelly L. McGee
SHELLY L MCGEE HOGAN & HARTSON LLP555 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing testing services relating to computers, computer software, network hardware, network software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage; security services relating to computers, computer software, network hardware, network software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage; consulting services relating to the testing and security of computers, computer software, network hardware, network software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage facilities; consulting services relating to the development and implementation of plans and policies to ensure continuity of service provided by computers, computer software, network hardware, network software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage facilities; consulting services relating to the development of plans and policies relating to the security of computers, computer software, network hardware, network software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage facilities; quality control and quality assurance services relating to computers, computer software, network hardware, network software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pan Security International Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Pan Security International Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Pan Security International Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PANSEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |