USPTO serial 76270493
STUDIO 54
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STUDIO 54?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glen M. Diehl
Glen M. Diehl Diehl Servilla LLC77 Brant AvenueSuite 210Clark, NJ 07066Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | STEREO SPEAKERS, HEADPHONES, RECORD TURNTABLES, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, STEREO AMPLIFIERS, CAR STEREOS, NEON LIGHTS FOR USE WITH STEREO SPEAKERS, NEON LIGHT KITS FOR MAKING NEON LIGHT RINGS FOR STEREO EQUIPMENT AND RADIO TUNERS, ALL THE FOREGOING FOR THE HOME, MOTOR VEHICLES AND BOATS | ACTIVE | Aug 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |