USPTO serial 76270682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Oremland
LAWRENCE R OREMLAND LAWRENCE R OREMLAND, PC5055 E BROADWAY BLVD STE C214TUCSON, AZ 85711-3626UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of educational research and development to provide education systems, teachers, trainers, and technical staff with technology resources for developing, delivering, and administering, courseware, and developing, implementing and managing educational computer and information technology systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 25, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |