USPTO serial 76270927
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David T. Burse
DAVID T BURSE BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and associated computer hardware for delivering visual perception tasks, as well as for delivering other perception stimuli for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies, for improving visual perception and acuity, and for developing improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system all for use by vision care professionals, therapists, and individuals; computer hardware, computer peripherals and associated computer hardware, namely, computer audio systems and headphones, automated glasses, input devices, sensors for measuring distance between subject and monitor, sensors for measuring room ambient light, sensors for measuring computer monitor luminescence, computer hardware and eyewear to enable three dimensional image generation and perception, and moldings, all for use by vision care professionals, therapist, and individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing training to vision care professionals and individuals on use of perception stimuli to develop improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system of individuals; providing training on computer software to vision care professionals and individuals; providing interactive training in the form of perception stimuli to develop improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system of individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Administering visual perception tasks, as well as other perception stimuli, for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies, and for improving visual perception and acuity in individuals; technical support services, namely trouble shooting of computer software problems in person, via telephone, and via e-mail | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |