Drawing for Serial No. 76271000

USPTO serial 76271000

Serial No. 76271000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76271000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES A. ZELLINGER

JAMES A ZELLINGER SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC410 SWING RDGREENSBORO, NC 27409UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, adjuvants and sprays for herbicides, insecticides, rodenticides, fungicides and pesticides; fertilizers for agriculture use; manure, plant growth regulators, and seed treatment preparationsACTIVE—
005Herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, pesticides, rodenticides for agricultural use, and preparations for destroying verminACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance