USPTO serial 76271011
TII LIGHTNING AND POWER SURGE SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TII LIGHTNING AND POWER SURGE SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Greenberg
DOCKET ADMINISTRATOR MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Over voltage and over-current power line protectors, protectors assemblies, and structural parts thereof; wireless and wireline co-axial over-voltage protectors, protector assemblies, and structural parts thereof; data line over-voltage protectors, protector assemblies and structural parts thereof; telephone line over-voltage protectors, protector assemblies, and structural parts thereof; over-voltage gas tube protectors and related apparatus, namely, surge arrester tubes, station protectors, protector assemblies, surge protectors, and gas tube arresters | ACTIVE | Jan 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |