Drawing for NEXTEL ITRAVELER

USPTO serial 76271018

NEXTEL ITRAVELER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOKOLS, GWEN P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXTEL ITRAVELER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY B. GOLDSMITH

AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE FL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EQUIPMENT USED IN PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE RADIOS, TWO-WAY RADIOS, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, DIGITAL CELLULAR TELEPHONES, MOBILE TELEPHONES, PAGERS AND MOBILE DATA TRANSCEIVERS USED IN PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; WIRELESS TELEPHONES FEATURING INSTANT CONFERENCING, DIGITAL CELLULAR, VOICE MAIL AND TEXT/NUMERIC MESSAGING; DIGITAL CELLULAR DEVICES AND WIRELESS HANDHELD COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, NAMELY MOBILE RADIOS, TWO-WAY RADIOS, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, DIGITAL CELLULAR TELEPHONES, MOBILE TELEPHONES, PAGERS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS AND TRANSCEIVERS USED IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS; WIRELESS TELEPHONES, WIRELESS TELEPHONE ACCESSORIES AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, MOBILE AND PORTABLE DISPATCH UNITS, NAMELY, RADIOS, PAGERS AND MOBILE DATA TRANSCEIVERS; BATTERIES AND RECHARGERS, ANTENNAS, REMOTE SPEAKER MICROPHONES AND HEADSETS; VEHICLE MOUNTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY MOUNTING RACKS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE FOR USE IN MOTOR VEHICLES; CARRYING CASES AND SPECIALTY HOLSTERS FOR CARRYING CELLULAR TELEPHONES, PAGERS, RADIOS AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; FACE PLATES AND KEYPADSACTIVE—
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY TWO-WAY RADIO DISPATCHING SERVICES, ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, VIDEO, IMAGES, DATA AND MESSAGES BY MEANS OF WIRELESS DEVICES, PAGING SERVICES, CELLULAR AND DIGITAL MOBILE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND DIGITAL CELLULAR DEVICES; ELECTRONIC MAIL; TELEPHONE VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES; TEXT, NUMERIC AND IMAGE WIRELESS MESSAGING; ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND DIGITAL WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES; WEB MESSAGING; WORLDWIDE SWITCHED TEXT AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES; PROVIDING CONNECTIONS TO WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, NAMELY, PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK BY MEANS OF A CELLULAR AND DIGITAL TELEPHONE SYSTEM AND PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ON-LINE SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ACCESS TO CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONE OR PERSONAL DIGITAL DEVICE CUSTOMERS TO THE INTERNET, WORLDWIDE WIRELESS WEB, INTRANETS, NETWORKS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS VIA THEIR CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONE OR PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO ONLINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS OF PUBLIC INTEREST FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS WHO ARE CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONE OR PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT CUSTOMERS ENABLING THEM TO TRANSMIT MESSAGES TO CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES OR PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS OVER THE INTERNET OR WORLDWIDE WIRELESS WEB; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, CELLULAR AND DIGITAL WIRELESS ROAMING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance