USPTO serial 76271085
SIR BENNI MILES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIR BENNI MILES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
67112 Mutterstadt, DE
67112 Mutterstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie L. Boccadoro
VALERIE L BOCCADORO OSTRAGER CHONG & FLAHERTY LLP825 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7519UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | action figures and accessories therefor; mechanical action toys; electrical action toys; action-type target games; action skill games; adult's and children's party games; toy airplanes; arcade games; aero-dynamic disk for use in playing catching games; ball pitching machines; board games; music box toys; card games; children's activity tables containing manipulative toys; game tables; gaming equipment, namely chips and game wheels; electronic dart games; electronic educational game machines for children; electronic game equipment with a watch function; hand-held game units for playing electronic and video games; hunting game calls, stand alone video game machines; manipulative games; paddle ball games; parlor games; pinball-type games; role playing games; toy guns and pistols; mobiles for children; model airplanes; model toy train sets; model toy vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; model toy vehicles sold separately; electronically operated toy motor vehicles; radio controlled toy vehicles; radio controlled model vehicles; musical toys; toy record players; skateboards; toy noisemakers; party favors in the nature of crackers or noisemakers; toy watches; toys designed to be attached to car seats, strollers, cribs and high chairs; transforming robotic toy vehicles; stuffed animal toys, and puzzles, namely jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles and cube-type puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |