Drawing for KRYPTONITE

USPTO serial 76271207

KRYPTONITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRYPTONITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark N. Mutterperl

MARK N MUTTERPERL FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 5TH AVE FL 30NEW YORK, NY 10103-3198UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007POWER TOOL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, DRILL BITS FOR POWER DRILLS, ROUTER BITS FOR ROUTERS, CIRCULAR SAW BLADES FOR POWER SAWS, POWER-OPERATED HOLE SAWS, ELECTRIC HAND HELD METAL CUTTING DRILLS, ELECTRIC HAND HELD MASONRY DRILLS AND ELECTRIC HAND HELD GLASS AND TITLE DRILLSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 27, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance