USPTO serial 76271265
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
Thomas J. Moore Bacon & Thomas, PLLC625 Slaters LaneFloor 4Alexandria, VA 22314-1176| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | All kinds herbal tea, coffee, coco, chocolate drink mix, ice, ice cream, seasoning, vinegar, food flavorings not being essential oils, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, seasonings, sugar, honey, candy, biscuit, grain biscuit, cake, bread, packaged hamburger sandwiches, curry flavor dumpling, pudding, Chinese pan cake with fillings, Chinese bun, green onion pie, pork bun shao mai containing primarily pork in the nature of meat pies, rice ball, flour-based Chinese new-year cake, rice cake, Chinese pan cake, spring roll, dumpling, hot pot fish dumpling, plain flour, mixed grain powder, pearl sago, namely, starch, congee, rice, instant noodle, mixed congee, wen ton, namely, minced pork contained in a flour-based wrapper, thin noodles, yeast, baking powder | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 14, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2010 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |