USPTO serial 76271268
KAO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2917663Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS J MOORE
Thomas J. Moore Bacon & Thomas, PLLC625 Slaters LaneFloor 4Alexandria, VA 22314-1176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT JUICE CONTAINING CARBON DIOXIDE; SPRING WATER; MINERAL WATER WITH OR WITHOUT CARBON DIOXIDE; FRUIT JUICES; VEGETABLE JUICES; GRASS JUICE; PLUM JUICE; AND ALMOND JUICE | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2010 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |