USPTO serial 76271281
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Pearce, Jr.
ROBERT W PEARCE JR NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH151 MEETING ST STE 600CHARLESTON, SC 29401-2207UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Brokerage of design, drawing and commissioned writing services all for the compilation of web pages on the Internet, web hosting services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for the Internet, and consulting services related to all of the foregoing; design, drawing and commissioned writing services all for the compilation of web pages on the Internet, web hosting services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for the Internet, and consulting services related to all of the foregoing; Brokerage of computer services, namely, design, development, customization, integration of computer applications, systems and networks, storage of data on computers, disaster recovery planning, data back-up and recovery services, database hosting, network infrastructure hosting, monitoring and management of computer networks, and consulting services relating to all of the foregoing; computer services, namely, design, development, customization, integration of computer applications, systems and networks, storage of data on computers, disaster recovery planning, data back-up and recovery services, database hosting and management, network infrastructure hosting and management, and consulting services related to all of the foregoing; Brokerage of information technology advisory and consulting services; information technology advisory and consulting services; providing information about computers, intellectual property, and web hosting for others; Brokerage of testing and security services relating to computer hardware, computer software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage and consulting services related to all of the foregoing; testing and security services relating to computer hardware, computer software, global communications networks, intranets, extranets, databases and data storage facilities and consulting services related to all of the foregoing; Brokerage of legal services; Application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation, use, maintenance and repair of computer hardware and software systems for others; brokerage of computer software services for others, namely, design, development, customization, installation, repair and maintenance of computer software; computer software services for others, namely, design, development, customization, installation, repair and maintenance of computer software; brokerage of computer software for others; providing information for others about the installation, repair, and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |