USPTO serial 76271365
PACKET 900
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACKET 900?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NOKIA VENTURE PARTNERS II, L.P.
MENLO PARK, CA
ARGO II; THE WIRELES-INTERNET FUND LIMITED
WAKEFIELD, MA
Other trademarks owned by ARGO II; THE WIRELES-INTERNET FUND LIMITED
Marlborough, MA
Marlborough, MA
BYTEMOBILE NETWORK SYSTEMS CORPORATION
MARLBOROUGH, MA
Other trademarks owned by BYTEMOBILE NETWORK SYSTEMS CORPORATION
MARLBOROUGH, MA
ST. PAUL VENTURE CAPITAL VI, LLC
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and computer hardware and operating software for handling internet protocol data services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOKIA VENTURE PARTNERS II, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by ARGO II; THE WIRELES-INTERNET FUND LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Avian Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Avian Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BYTEMOBILE NETWORK SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PROQUENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ST. PAUL VENTURE CAPITAL VI, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PACKET 900
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |