USPTO serial 76271416
MGM MIRAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2758014Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2003
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MGM MIRAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp.
Los Angeles, CA
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp.
Santa Monica, CA
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp.
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. McCue
Michael J. McCue Lewis and Roca LLP3993 Howard Hughes ParkwaySte. 600Las Vegas, NV 89169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Resort hotel, restaurant, bar, lounge beauty salon and health spa services; providing conventions facilities | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MGM MIRAGE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |