USPTO serial 76271436
MOONWATCH MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOONWATCH MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LOWRIE LANDO & ANASTAS LLPONE MAIN STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Commercial information and computer services on subjects related to retail technology, supply chain technology, e-commerce technology, information technology, and supply chain management, via websites on the global computer network, via the Internet, and via e-mail, including creating and providing online content in text, electronic documents, databases, graphics, audiovisual and multimedia formats; creating and providing access to electronic and online newsletters, news stories, columns, cartoons, articles, and other website content as well as briefing papers, white papers, slide presentations, flow charts, information technology and business process roadmaps, surveys and associated survey results, and directories in the fields of retail technology, supply chain technology, e-commerce technology, information technology, and supply chain management; hosting of digital content on the Internet, namely creating databases and providing access to them; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network, namely providing access to databases so that database users may conduct customized searches and obtain reports from the databases; hosting of digital content on the Internet, namely, organizing and providing access on own websites to relevant third-party content; providing digital content on the Internet to others, namely, syndicating own content to third-party content providers for use on their websites; hosting own and others' web sites on a server for a global computer network, namely, providing own and others' tradeshow and conference websites featuring online registration, online tradeshow attendee, exhibitor, and news media support services; and providing consulting and research services in the connection with all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |