USPTO serial 76271781
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of Natural Resources
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of Natural Resources
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of Natural Resources
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISABETH H. COAKLEY
LISABETH H COAKLEY DICKEY & PIERCE PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | home electric and mechanical heating and ventilation systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PBPO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |