USPTO serial 76271822
APOLLO AMATEUR NIGHT ON TOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APOLLO AMATEUR NIGHT ON TOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert T. Scherer
ROBERT T SCHERER TIME WARNER INCONE TIME WARNER CTRLEGAL DEPTNEW YORK, NY 10019-8016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING MUSIC, SINGING, DRAMA, COMEDY, DANCE, THE SPOKEN WORD; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DISKS FEATURING MUSIC, SINGING, DRAMA, COMEDY, DANCE AND THE SPOKEN WORD; AND MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING MUSIC, SINGING, DRAMA, COMEDY, DANCE AND THE SPOKEN WORD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |